题

一个VMware群集和两个Mnutanix群集

o
你好，

目前，我们的Nutanix在其顶部运行，但具有一些特殊性：

从VMware的角度来看，它有一个八个节点的群集，但是.....
我们在这两个nutanix簇（每个节点4个节点）下。
我的问题是...这种配置有多糟糕？根本不好吗？
我继承了此配置，这是我第一次看到这样的配置。

如果您能告诉我此设置的优缺点，我将非常感激，因为我们正在经历网络中断，而且我不知道TI是否与此设置有关。

谢谢 ！！！
    \r\n
    \r\nWe currently have nutanix with vmware running on top of it but with some particularities:
    \r\n
    \r\nFrom a VMware perspective it has one cluster of eight nodes but.....
    \r\nWhat we have under that is two nutanix clusters (4 node each).
    \r\nMy question is... How bad is this configuration? is it bad at all?
    \r\nI inherited this config and i it is the first time i see a config like this.
    \r\n
    \r\nIf you can tell me the pros and cons of this setup i would be very grateful as we are experiencing networks outages and i don't know if ti would be related to this setup.
    \r\n
    \r\nThanks !!!","quoteUsername":"Oriol","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
    该主题已关闭以供评论

    3个答复

    j
    UserLevel 7
    徽章 +25
    @aluciani商业论坛可能更好，因为DVS/DVR工作与CE中的OVS工作不同。

    @oriol您是否与供应商开了支持案？您能否描述将vCenter群集分成两个单独的小型AOS组的动力？

    在内存中刮擦，但认为ESX集成产生了一个Nutanixvswitch，它将在其上有CVM和一个内核端口。它旨在使用192.168.5.x，如果两个群集都试图使用nutanixvswitch和相同的寻址方案，则将重复。我不知道您是否要手动将您的“子簇”分离为独立的Vswitches（例如NutanixvSwitch1和2），但我认为您会杀死您的支持性。

    如果这些确实是独立的簇，我会将vCenter群集分为两个，以匹配您的AOS群集映射。
    @aluciani<\/user-mention> probably better for the commercial forum as the DVS\/DVR work is different than the OVS work in CE.
    \r\n
    \r\n@Oriol<\/user-mention> did you open a support case with your supplier? Can you describe your motivation for splitting your vCenter cluster into two separate small AOS groups?
    \r\n
    \r\nScraping at memory, but thought ESX integration created a NutanixvSwitch which would have the CVM on it and a kernel port. That is designed to use 192.168.5.x which would be duplicated if both clusters tried to use NutanixvSwitch and the same addressing scheme. I don't know if you were to manually isolate your \"sub-clusters\" into independent vSwitches (e.g. nutanixvswitch1 and 2) than it might work but I think you will kill your supportability.
    \r\n
    \r\nIf those are really independent clusters I would split the vCenter cluster into two to match your AOS cluster mapping.","quoteUsername":"jrack","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
    o
    你好，

    我发现此设置适用于不再有效的MTERO群集。
    \r\n
    \r\nI found out that this setup is for a mtero cluster that is no longer working....","quoteUsername":"Oriol","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
    j
    UserLevel 7
    徽章 +25
    是的，不确定CE是否可以做地铁，因此最好在支持下检查。如果他们在同一L2上，他们为什么要做地铁？
    条款和条件
    Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.button":"Accept cookies","cookiepolicy.button.deny":"Deny all","cookiepolicy.link":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.title":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.content":"We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.modal.level1":"Basic
    Functional","cookiepolicy.modal.level2":"Normal
    Functional + analytics","cookiepolicy.modal.level3":"Complete
    Functional + analytics + social media + embedded videos"}}}">
    Baidu