保护域VM限制

  • 2015年3月6日
  • 6个答复
  • 1523次观看
b
徽章 +7
我听说有传言说，对于4.1.1.3，保护域限制将是每个保护域的100台机器。那个谣言有道理吗？

6个答复

C
秩
UserLevel 3
徽章 +14
仍然不确定，所以这些是谣言。
-CB
G
徽章 +4
嗨

请问有明确和/或建议的限制吗？
\n
\nIs there a definite and\/or recommended limit please?","quoteUsername":"gummett","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
C
秩
UserLevel 3
徽章 +14
嗨，

“保护域可以具有多个一致性组。您可以在单个保护域中的任何数量的一致性组（最多50）内保护最多50 VM”

因此，我们仍然在特定保护域上限制了50 VM的限制。
-CB
\n
\n\"Protection domains can have multiple consistency groups. You can protect a maximum of 50 VMs within any number of consistency groups (up to 50) in a single protection domain\"
\n
\nSo we still ahve the limitation of 50 VMs on a particular Protection Domain.","quoteUsername":"cbadami","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
j
徽章 +7
我有4.1.5，并确认ASYNC DR仍然限制为50。尽管我希望它会知道，但界面尚未改变。
t
徽章 +2
4.6.1和4.71中的限制相同
但是，我们确实在140毫无问题的情况下以140的开发器运行更高的1 PD。
不会做生产
\nBut we do run higher 1 PD with dev test machines at 140 without problems.
\nWould not do it for production","quoteUsername":"thread","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
amunoztico
Userlevel 1
徽章 +4
您有版本5的新限制吗？
Alvaro Munoz -Cloud＆Virtualization Topgun -GBM Corporation

回复


条款和条件
Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.button":"Accept cookies","cookiepolicy.button.deny":"Deny all","cookiepolicy.link":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.title":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.content":"We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.modal.level1":"Basic
Functional","cookiepolicy.modal.level2":"Normal
Functional + analytics","cookiepolicy.modal.level3":"Complete
Functional + analytics + social media + embedded videos"}}}">
Baidu