Veeam备份-虚拟机在快照删除被击晕

  • 2016年11月23日
  • 3回复
  • 1971的浏览量
J
徽章
嗨,所有
我们正在将一个新的Nutanix Block上线，并开始移动一些生产虚拟机。在我们的Veeam备份测试中，我们看到了在Veeam备份中删除快照的明显问题(在某些情况下，虚拟机不可用长达一分钟)。我们在nutanix NFS数据存储上安装了一个veeam代理，并且正在运行vsphere6、最新的nutanix OS等，以及最新版本的veeam 9.5。我确实在Nutanix论坛上找到了一篇关于强迫NDB/网络模式来帮助解决这个问题的文章，这确实改善了事情，但还不足以称其解决。我不可能每次执行备份时都让我的主SQL服务器震惊，所以在这一点上有一点值得注意。现在只是在寻找灵感吗?杰夫
    \nWe are just bringing a new Nutanix Block online and starting to move some production VMs.With our Veeam backup testing we are seeing noticeable stun (in some cases up to a minute of VM unavailable) issues with snapshot removals that are done as part of Veeam backups. We have a veeam proxy installed on the nutanix NFS datastore, and are running vsphere6, latest Nutanix OS, etc. and latest version of Veeam 9.5.I did find a article on Nutanix forums about forcing NDB\/network mode to help with this and this did improve thing but not enough to call it resolved. I cannot have my primary SQL server stunned every time we do a backup, so this is a bit of show stopper at this point.Just looking for ideas at this point?Jeff","quoteUsername":"jeffbourassa","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    3回复

    dlink7
    Userlevel 4
    徽章 + 19
    我想这篇博文可能会对你有所帮助

    http://www.virtualtothecore.com/en/protecting-nfs-storage-vsphere-using-veeam-virtual-proxies/

    NFS与适当的regkey
    乔恩
    排名
    Userlevel 6
    徽章 + 29
    dlink7’s的文章很好，浏览一遍，看看效果如何。

    如果这没有帮助，请打开我们和Veeam的支持票，我们很高兴深入合作的细节。
    JonKohler |技术总监，工程，Nutanix | Nutanix NPX #003, VCDX #116 | @JonKohler |如果有用请赞美!
    dlink7<\/a>'s article is great, run through that and see how it goes.
    \n
    \nIf it doesn't help, please open a support ticket with both us and Veeam, we're happy to dig into the details collaboratively.","quoteUsername":"Jon","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
    乔恩
    排名
    Userlevel 6
    徽章 + 29
    此外，值得一提的是，远程热添加和长时间的眩晕时间是VMware的一个问题，在VMware的产品中已经存在了差不多十年:https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2010953

    他们还推荐LAN/NBD模式用于支持VADP的备份产品，如Veeam。我在Veeam、NetWorker、Avamar、NetBackup等平台上见过同样的问题，LAN/NBD模式几乎总是能解决这个问题。

    Veeam牌的钥匙dlink7如果Veeam代理和目标虚拟机同时在同一个主机上，那么HotAdd会比NBD模式“更快”(使用任何存储，只是因为IO对NBD模式的方式)。一个很好的拥有，但不完美。

    我个人还没有使用Veeam的DirectNFS，这是v9+的一个特性，所以不知道这是否会有帮助。
    JonKohler |技术总监，工程，Nutanix | Nutanix NPX #003, VCDX #116 | @JonKohler |如果有用请赞美!
    https:\/\/kb.vmware.com\/kb\/2010953<\/a>
    \n
    \nThey also recommend LAN\/NBD mode for VADP enabled backup products, like Veeam. I've seen this exact same issue with Veeam, NetWorker, Avamar, NetBackup, and so on, and LAN\/NBD mode almost always solves it.
    \n
    \nThe Veeam reg keys that dlink7<\/a> mentioned gives you some opportunistic HotAdd, which is historically \"faster\" than NBD mode (with any storage, ever, just because of the way the IO for NBD mode), if the Veeam proxy and the target VM are on the same host at the same time. a nice to have, but not perfect.
    \n
    \nI haven't personally used DirectNFS from Veeam yet, which is a feature in v9+, so no idea if that will help here or not.","quoteUsername":"Jon","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    回复


    Baidu