VEEAM备份 - VM在快照拆除时被惊呆了

  • 2016年11月23日
  • 3个答复
  • 1971年的观点
j
徽章
大家好
我们只是在网上带来一个新的Nutanix块，并开始移动一些生产VM。在我们看到的Veeam备份测试中，我们看到了明显的昏迷（在某些情况下，最多无法使用VM的一分钟），使用快照删除措施作为Veeam完成的快照删除。备份。我们在Nutanix NFS数据存储上安装了Veeam代理，并且正在运行vSphere6，最新的Nutanix OS等。以及最新版本的Veeam 9.5.我确实在Nutanix论坛上找到了有关强迫NDB/网络模式来帮助这一点的文章确实有所改善，但不足以称其为解决。每次备份时，我都不能使我的主要SQL Server震惊，所以此时这是一些表演的阻止。
    \nWe are just bringing a new Nutanix Block online and starting to move some production VMs.With our Veeam backup testing we are seeing noticeable stun (in some cases up to a minute of VM unavailable) issues with snapshot removals that are done as part of Veeam backups. We have a veeam proxy installed on the nutanix NFS datastore, and are running vsphere6, latest Nutanix OS, etc. and latest version of Veeam 9.5.I did find a article on Nutanix forums about forcing NDB\/network mode to help with this and this did improve thing but not enough to call it resolved. I cannot have my primary SQL server stunned every time we do a backup, so this is a bit of show stopper at this point.Just looking for ideas at this point?Jeff","quoteUsername":"jeffbourassa","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    3个答复

    dlink7
    UserLevel 4
    徽章 +19
    我认为这篇博客文章可能会帮助您

    http://www.virtualtothecore.com/en/protecting-nfs-storage-vsphere-using-using-veeam-virtual-proxies/

    NFS与Apporaite Regkeys
    乔恩
    秩
    UserLevel 6
    徽章 +29
    dlink7的文章很棒，贯穿其中，看看它的发展方式。

    如果无济于事，请与我们和Veeam一起打开一张支持票，我们很乐意协作挖掘细节。
    乔恩·科勒|Nutanix工程技术总监|Nutanix NPX＃003，VCDX＃116 |@jonkohler |如果有用的话，请荣誉！
    dlink7<\/a>'s article is great, run through that and see how it goes.
    \n
    \nIf it doesn't help, please open a support ticket with both us and Veeam, we're happy to dig into the details collaboratively.","quoteUsername":"Jon","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
    乔恩
    秩
    UserLevel 6
    徽章 +29
    同样，值得一提的是，远程热添加和漫长的昏迷时间是VMware的一个问题，它实际上是十年的大部分时间：https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2010953

    他们还建议使用VEEAM（例如Veeam）的VADP备份产品LAN/NBD模式。我已经看到了Veeam，Networker，Avamar，NetBackup等的同样问题，而LAN/NBD模式几乎总是可以解决它。

    Veeam Reg键dlink7提到给您一些机会性的HOTADD，这在历史上比NBD模式“更快”（有任何存储，曾经，仅仅是因为NBD模式的IO的方式），如果Veeam代理和目标VM在同一主机上，则同时。很高兴拥有，但不是完美的。

    我还没有亲自使用Veeam的DirectNF，这是V9+的功能，因此不知道在这里是否有帮助。
    乔恩·科勒|Nutanix工程技术总监|Nutanix NPX＃003，VCDX＃116 |@jonkohler |如果有用的话，请荣誉！
    https:\/\/kb.vmware.com\/kb\/2010953<\/a>
    \n
    \nThey also recommend LAN\/NBD mode for VADP enabled backup products, like Veeam. I've seen this exact same issue with Veeam, NetWorker, Avamar, NetBackup, and so on, and LAN\/NBD mode almost always solves it.
    \n
    \nThe Veeam reg keys that dlink7<\/a> mentioned gives you some opportunistic HotAdd, which is historically \"faster\" than NBD mode (with any storage, ever, just because of the way the IO for NBD mode), if the Veeam proxy and the target VM are on the same host at the same time. a nice to have, but not perfect.
    \n
    \nI haven't personally used DirectNFS from Veeam yet, which is a feature in v9+, so no idea if that will help here or not.","quoteUsername":"Jon","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    回复


    Baidu