问题

Cisco Switch用于小型部署——使用哪一种?

  • 2021年7月17日
  • 0回答
  • 65的浏览量
T

你好,

我是这个论坛的新手。事实上，我对Nutanix的世界是陌生的。

我们目前有一个传统的VMWARE集群，带有传统的FC SAN存储和Catalyst 3850交换机(7台服务器)。

我们计划用一个基于NUTANIX(6个节点左右)但使用VMWARE作为hypervisor的全新解决方案来替代它。

出现的问题是:

  1. 我们需要为NUTANIX连接安装2个新的“机架顶部”开关。如果使用Cisco(并考虑到我们提议的集群大小)，我们可以使用哪一个?我的意思是，Catalyst 9300可以吗?还是只能是更贵的Nexus ?为了降低初始成本，我们计划保留Cat 3850作为核心交换机，也因为我们需要连接其他设备，但我们需要为新节点连接设备。
  2. 我们目前的VMWARE服务器有2 × 10G的数据/VEEAM BK连接，2 × 1G的vSphere MGMT/vMotion连接。为了处理数据流量和“磁盘sinc”流量，我们应该为新节点提供4 × 10G(2个用于data /veeam BK, 2个用于NUTANIX/VMWARE流量)，还是设置2 × 25G，或者让它加入2 × 10G ?

非常感谢您的帮助!!

谢谢你! !

Hello,<\/p>

I\u00b4m new in this forum. In fact I\u00b4m new in the Nutanix world.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

We currently have a traditional VMWARE cluster with traditional FC SAN Storage and Catalyst 3850 switches (7 servers).<\/p>

We are planning to replace it with a brand new solution based on NUTANIX (with 6 nodes or so) but using VMWARE as hypervisor.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

The question that arise are:<\/p>

  1. We need to install 2 new \u201ctop of the rack\u201d switches for NUTANIX connections. If using Cisco (and taking into account our proposed cluster size) which one could we use ? I mean, Catalyst 9300 are ok ? Or they have to be the more expensive Nexus ?\u00a0 To reduce initial costs we are planning to keep the Cat 3850 to act as coreswitch and also because we need to conect other devices, but we need to ones for the new nodes.<\/li>\t
  2. Our current VMWARE Servers have 2 x 10G connection for DATA\/VEEAM BK and 2 x 1G for vSphere MGMT\/vMotion. In order to cope with data traffic but also with \u201cdisk sinc\u201d traffic, should we provide the new nodes with\u00a0 4 x 10G (2 for DATA\/veeam BK and 2 for NUTANIX\/VMWARE traffic) or just set 2 x 25G or let it in 2 x 10G ?<\/li><\/ol>

    I would appreciate your help !!<\/p>

    Thanks you !!<\/p>

    \u00a0<\/p>","quoteUsername":"TinchoB","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

0回答

做第一个回复的人!

回复


Baidu