Microsoft群集RDM

  • 2015年7月2日
  • 2回复
  • 907意见
一种
徽章 +10
你好，

我实际上有一个查询。在Microsoft群集的情况下，它们的要求是Quorum磁盘的要求。在Nutanix社区中的一些文章，他们是单独的企业许可，Microsoft群集所需的SQL Opplyon可用性组才能实现该集群的本地数据存储或使用称为SIOS DateAkeEper的工具。
    \n
    \nI actually have one query.In case of microsoft cluster their is a requirement of quorum disk.so normallly in vmware environments the disk used for quorum is RDM.so my question is how we can resolve this problem in nutanix box.?.i found some post in the nutanix community that their is a seperate Enterprise licensing, SQL AlwaysOn availability groups required for the microsoft cluster to achieve local datastore for the cluster or using tool called SIOS DataKeeper.Can someone please advise on this.thanks in advance.","quoteUsername":"alunkal","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    2回复

    t
    UserLevel 2
    徽章 +14
    对于我们的群集，我们利用文件共享证人 - 一个很好的博客。它不能在所有群集选项中工作，但是对于诸如Exchange和SQL之类的事物，它往往运行良好，并且在VMotion方面非常好，这是虚拟机之间SCSI总线共享的巨大限制。

    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2012/06/06/27/clustering-what-what-what-what-sactly-is-a-file-share-nare-witness-and-andness-and-y-when shorn-should-i-iase-sone。aspx
    一种
    徽章 +10
    你好，

    感谢您的宝贵信息。这对我来说是新的，因为我在Windows中没有经验。我浏览了您提到的文档。我对此有一些疑问。

    1.根据链接https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770620%28v=ws.10%29.aspx，建议使用nodes和fileshare选项。那么，为什么不建议单个站点集群。

    2.在“需求”和“建议”部分中，节点和磁盘多数我可以看到LUN格式应为nfs。


    3.您提到的FSW在交换和SQL方面效果很好。由于我对Microsoft中的群集方案不多。除了SQL和Exchange以外，其他情况下使用了Microsoft群集的其他场景。为他人。


    我上面提到的问题似乎是为您愚蠢的。


    RGD
    里奇·詹姆斯
    \n
    \nThanks for your valuable information.This information is new to me as i am not experienced in windows.i go through the document which you mentioned .i have some doubts on that.
    \n
    \n1.nodes and fileshare option is recommended for multisite cluster as per the link https:\/\/technet.microsoft.com\/en-us\/library\/cc770620%28v=WS.10%29.aspx. so why it is not recomended for single site cluster.?
    \n
    \n2.in the requirementa and recommendation section for node and disk majority i can see that the lun format should be nfs.so is there any requirement of physical lun(RDM) disk.or can we use virtual disk for this option.
    \n
    \n
    \n3.you mentioned fsw work well for exchange and sql.as i dont have much lnowledge of cluster scenarios in microsoft.what are the other scenarios where microsoft cluster is used other than sql and exchange.if there are other scenarios why this fsw not suitable for others.
    \n
    \n
    \n the questions which i mentioned above seems to stupid questions for you 🙂.but please take the questions as coming from a begineer in windows clustering.Please review my questions and advise me.thanks in advance
    \n
    \n
    \nrgds
    \nritchie james","quoteUsername":"alunkal","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

    回复


    条款和条件
    Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.button":"Accept cookies","cookiepolicy.button.deny":"Deny all","cookiepolicy.link":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.title":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.content":"We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.modal.level1":"Basic
    Functional","cookiepolicy.modal.level2":"Normal
    Functional + analytics","cookiepolicy.modal.level3":"Complete
    Functional + analytics + social media + embedded videos"}}}">
    Baidu