解决了

Nutanix文件设计 - 与其他类型的工作负载一起运行

v
徽章 +1

你好，

您能为我提供任何建议和/或将我指向运行Nutanix文件以及其他类型的工作负载（在ESXI上）的任何文档？IE。服务器虚拟化，VDI，其他文件实例，用于资源争议的可持续性，资源保留等。

虽然我确实知道，在一个专用的HCI群集的极端情况下，只有FSVM-S分布在节点中，但文件肯定会表现良好，我追求更多真实世界的场景，文件仍然可以传递。

谢谢，维克多。

图标

最好的答案阿罗纳2021年3月4日，03：41

Hi Victor,<\/p>

Running Nutanix Files alongside other types of workloads in a Nutanix cluster is a perfectly viable solution. As always, the main question here is to make sure that the cluster has sufficient resources to cope with the load.<\/p>

Nutanix Files Sizing Guide<\/a><\/p>

You can also try Nutanix Sizer<\/a> to help you determine the resources required on the cluster altogether.<\/p>","className":"post__content__best_answer"}">

查看原件
Hi,<\/p>

Can you please help me with any recommendation and\/or point me to any documentation around running Nutanix Files alongside other types of workloads (on ESXi)? I.e. server virtualisation, VDI, other Files instances, sustainability for resource contention, resource reservation, etc.<\/p>

While I do understand that in an extreme case of a dedicated HCI cluster where only FSVM-s are spread across the nodes, Files would surely perform well, I\u2019m after more real-world scenarios, where Files still deliver.<\/p>

Thank you, Victor.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"VictorKiwi","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

该主题已关闭以供评论

7个答复

阿罗纳
秩
UserLevel 6
徽章 +5

嗨，维克多，

在Nutanix群集中运行Nutanix文件以及其他类型的工作负载是一个非常可行的解决方案。与往常一样，这里的主要问题是确保集群具有足够的资源来应对负载。

Nutanix文件大小指南

你也可以尝试nutanix sizer帮助您完全确定集群所需的资源。

Hi Victor,<\/p>

Running Nutanix Files alongside other types of workloads in a Nutanix cluster is a perfectly viable solution. As always, the main question here is to make sure that the cluster has sufficient resources to cope with the load.<\/p>

Nutanix Files Sizing Guide<\/a><\/p>

You can also try Nutanix Sizer<\/a> to help you determine the resources required on the cluster altogether.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"Alona","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

v
徽章 +1

嗨，Alona，

感谢您回答我的问题。

我还记得从下一个会议以及其他事件和文档中回想起的，nutanix的混合工作量将完全可以。

我问的原因是，一些与我们一起在现有环境中设计附加文件实例的外部政党建议：

“请注意，Nutanix强烈建议使用最小的CPU /内存争论在专用群集或服务器虚拟化集群上部署文件，不建议将文件群集放在繁忙的VDI或数据库群集上。”

外部方意识到，尽管我们将文件放在带有Xenapp和vdi的群集上，但不会有内存的争夺，而CPU比率约为1：3或更高。

我试图找到任何证实其陈述但无法确认的文档，因此决定达到真理的来源，即您，供应商。:)您能否建议Nutanix是否确实有这样的建议，以及哪种形式？

谢谢！

Hi Alona,<\/p>

Thank you for replying to my question.<\/p>

I also recall from various NEXT conferences and other events and documentation, that Nutanix would be perfectly fine with mixed workloads.<\/p>

The reason I asked, was that some external party that works with us on a design of an additional Files instance in our existing environment, advised that:<\/p>

\u201cPlease note that Nutanix strongly recommend deploying files on dedicated cluster or server virtualization cluster with minimal CPU \/ Memory contention, does NOT recommend placing files cluster on busy VDI or database cluster.\u201d<\/p>

The external party was aware that although we\u2019re placing the Files on to a cluster with XenApp and VDI, there wouldn\u2019t be memory contention, and CPU ratio would be around 1:3 or below.<\/p>

I was trying to find any documentation that confirms their statement, but wasn\u2019t able to, therefore decided to reach the source of truth, i.e. you, the vendor. :) Can you please advise if Nutanix indeed has such recommendation, and in what form?<\/p>

Thank you!<\/p>","quoteUsername":"VictorKiwi","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

阿罗纳
秩
UserLevel 6
徽章 +5

嗯，很有趣。

您可以在专用群集上运行nutanix文件，或将其放在群集运行的用户VM上。与独立的NAS设备不同，文件可以合并VM和文件存储，从而消除了创建基础架构筒仓的需求。管理员可以像VM Services一样使用Nutanix Prism管理文件，该服务统一并简化了管理。与Active Directory（AD）集成可以支持身份验证，基于访问的枚举，配额和自助恢复功能。Nutanix文件还支持文件服务器克隆，该文件使您可以在现场备份文件，并运行防病毒扫描和机器学习而不会影响生产。

Nutanix文件性能

同样，只要群集根据工作负载进行尺寸，并且可以正确配置。也许他已经看到了特定版本的一些问题？我要求外部聚会详细说明。

Hmm, interesting.<\/p>

You can run Nutanix Files on a dedicated cluster or place it on a cluster running user VMs. Unlike standalone NAS appliances, Files consolidates VM and file storage, eliminating the need to create an infrastructure silo. Administrators can manage Files with Nutanix Prism, just like VM services, which unifies and simplifies management. Integration with Active Directory (AD) enables support for authentication, access-based enumeration, quotas, and the Self-Service Restore feature. Nutanix Files also supports file server cloning, which lets you back up Files off-site, as well as run antivirus scans and machine learning without affecting production.<\/p><\/blockquote>

Nutanix Files Performance<\/a><\/p>

Again, as long as the cluster is sized according to the workloads and is configured correctly. Maybe he has seen some issues with a particular version? I\u2019d ask that external party to elaborate.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"Alona","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

v
徽章 +1

他们建议部署即将到来的文件版本3.8。他们只是遵守“ Nutanix建议”。

毫无疑问，适当尺寸的集群尺寸。该评论围绕着他们的犹豫，以确保我们在共享环境中部署文件，即使尺寸适当。

因此，简而言之，Nutanix本身没有任何在任何地方记录的建议，还是以其他方式已知？

谢谢Alona。

They are proposing to deploy the coming Files version 3.8. And they just adhere to that \u201cNutanix recommendation\u201d.<\/p>

Properly sizing the cluster is without a doubt. The comment is around their hesitance to guarantee any performance if we deploy Files in a shared environment, even when properly sized.<\/p>

So in brief, Nutanix themselves don\u2019t have such recommendation documented anywhere, or otherwise known?<\/p>

Thanks Alona.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"VictorKiwi","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

阿罗纳
秩
UserLevel 6
徽章 +5

他们尤其是他们按独立的文件部署。我可以看到如何轻松保证在单环境中的性能。我也会理解他们是否将其措辞作为建议，但Nutanix并不坚持与其他工作负载分开部署文件。相反，大多数事情被设计为能够在同一集群中共存。

It is peculiar that they press for a standalone deployment of the Files. I can see how it would be easy to guarantee performance in a mono-environment. I would also understand if they worded it as their recommendation but Nutanix does not insist on deploying Files separately from other workloads. On the contrary, most things are designed to be able to co-exist in the same cluster.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"Alona","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
v
徽章 +1

非常感谢您对此的评论。

Thank you very much Alona\u00a0for your comment on this.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"VictorKiwi","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
阿罗纳
秩
UserLevel 6
徽章 +5

很高兴提供帮助，维克多。

Happy to help, Victor.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"Alona","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
条款和条件
Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.button":"Accept cookies","cookiepolicy.button.deny":"Deny all","cookiepolicy.link":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.title":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.content":"We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.modal.level1":"Basic
Functional","cookiepolicy.modal.level2":"Normal
Functional + analytics","cookiepolicy.modal.level3":"Complete
Functional + analytics + social media + embedded videos"}}}">
Baidu