我阅读了支持和见解页面。
分布式共享或导出是一个用户的个人文件的存储库,标准共享是一个组共享的存储库。分布式共享或导出分布在顶级目录,而标准共享是在单个文件服务器VM (FSVM)上。”
这是否意味着,如果我为100个用户创建一个名为“Shared”的标准共享,那么所有100个用户都将访问单个FSVM ?
为什么我不想创建分布式的“共享”来分散负载呢?
我们的第一个Files设置将D$作为唯一一个已分发的顶级共享。其他股票低于此标准。有什么问题吗?不知道我们为什么这么做,也不知道我们是否完全理解。至少下面的D$与共享类似于Windows文件服务器。
图标
最佳答案DavidN2021年8月12日21:50
A few years back when we first setup our first Files cluster (and File Analytics) there were some differences in terms of what capabilities & features Standard \/ Distributed Share could support.<\/p>
Since then, much <\/em>improvements\/feature parity has been done to eliminate\/improve these\u2026<\/p>Regardless of my notes, please review the Files and Files Analytics documentation & release notes to confirm my statements.<\/p>
(i.e. these notes\/statements may be dated but were valid at one point):<\/p>
Distributed shares<\/p>
- Could NOT have any files\u00a0in the root of the share<\/li>\t
- MMC.exe could NOT be used to manage it (must use Nutanix Files Snap-In)<\/li>\t
- Nested Shares were supported<\/li>\t
- Files Analytics wouldn\u2019t collect stats for sub-shares - I believe with the newest Files Analytics this is now <\/em><\/strong>supported (double check it pls)<\/li>\t
- From my own testing the Default permissions are
\tDomain Admins: Full Control
\tDomain users: Read Only\u00a0<\/strong>(Standard share would set this to \u201cFull access\u201d
\tCreator Owner: Full Control<\/li>\t- Encryption as of Files 3.5<\/li>\t
- Couldn\u2019t create Folders with Explorer in the top level of the share (May have be available with newer Files as of 3.5+)<\/li><\/ul>
Standard shares<\/p>
- Can\u2019t be converted to a Distributed share<\/li>\t
- Can have files in the root of the share<\/li>\t
- Use both mmc.exe (shared folders plugin) AND Nutanix Files plugin to be managed<\/li>\t
- Encryption as of Files 3.5<\/li>\t
- Can\u2019t have nested shares<\/li><\/ul>","className":"post__content__best_answer"}">
查看原始