服务器虚拟化

Manually put related ESXi host in Maintainance mode -> Exit Maintainance mode -> Start CVM\n3) Go to PRIMS and upgrade continues... and so does 2048...\n \n- Koji","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/hypervisor-upgrade-esxi-using-one-click-host-maintainance-mode-issue-11093?postid=11093#post11093","creationDate":"2016-06-23T08:41:47+0000","relativeCreationDate":"5 years ago"},"isTopicUnread":true,"privateId":34389,"id":11093,"type":"post","hasCurrentUserLiked":false,"isSticky":false,"features":[],"forum":{"id":27,"isIdeation":false,"url":"\/server-virtualization-27","title":"Server Virtualization","description":"Discussions about Multi-Hypervisors Microsoft Hyper-V, VMware ESXi, and Nutanix AHV."},"url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/hypervisor-upgrade-esxi-using-one-click-host-maintainance-mode-issue-11093","title":"Hypervisor Upgrade (ESXi) using One Click (Host Maintainance Mode issue)","lastPost":{"id":11266,"author":{"id":9121,"url":"\/members\/jon-9121","name":"Jon","avatar":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/icon\/200x200\/c1fe8ab4-02b4-4d13-8fb2-7248dc64a067.png","userTitle":"Nutanix Employee","rank":{"isBold":false,"isItalic":false,"isUnderline":false,"icon":"37a898b2-5836-48f7-8638-a2655ab662a1.png","iconUrl":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/37a898b2-5836-48f7-8638-a2655ab662a1.png","avatarIcon":"7e8707dd-f993-470f-800f-3adc68e91f02_thumb.png","avatarIconUrl":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/7e8707dd-f993-470f-800f-3adc68e91f02_thumb.png","name":"Nutanix Employee","color":"#0873ba"},"userLevel":6},"content":"Also, for the sake of posterity, can you submit a support ticket, so we can formally track this? Ideally, we should detect this issue and notify you up front.","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/hypervisor-upgrade-esxi-using-one-click-host-maintainance-mode-issue-11093?postid=11266#post11266","creationDate":"2016-06-30T21:46:23+0000","relativeCreationDate":"5 years ago"},"lastReply":{"id":11266,"author":{"id":9121,"url":"\/members\/jon-9121","name":"Jon","avatar":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/icon\/200x200\/c1fe8ab4-02b4-4d13-8fb2-7248dc64a067.png","userTitle":"Nutanix Employee","rank":{"isBold":false,"isItalic":false,"isUnderline":false,"icon":"37a898b2-5836-48f7-8638-a2655ab662a1.png","iconUrl":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/37a898b2-5836-48f7-8638-a2655ab662a1.png","avatarIcon":"7e8707dd-f993-470f-800f-3adc68e91f02_thumb.png","avatarIconUrl":"https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/7e8707dd-f993-470f-800f-3adc68e91f02_thumb.png","name":"Nutanix Employee","color":"#0873ba"},"userLevel":6},"content":"Also, for the sake of posterity, can you submit a support ticket, so we can formally track this? Ideally, we should detect this issue and notify you up front.","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/hypervisor-upgrade-esxi-using-one-click-host-maintainance-mode-issue-11093?postid=11266#post11266","creationDate":"2016-06-30T21:46:23+0000","relativeCreationDate":"5 years ago"},"numberOfUnreadReplies":0,"numberOfReplies":2,"numberOfLikes":0,"relevantPost":{"id":11093,"author":{"id":27975,"url":"\/members\/kojimatsuda-27975","name":"KojiMatsuda","avatar":"","userTitle":"Voyager","rank":{"isBold":false,"isItalic":false,"isUnderline":false,"name":"Voyager","color":"#000000"},"userLevel":0},"content":"Apart from listed pre-requisites before starting Hypervisor Upgrade (ESXi) listed below, had to Disable Affinity Rules under DRS to enable ESXi host go into Maintainance mode and continue update.\n \nGot stuck since i did found this part the hard way...\n1) Genesis.out log pointed the target CVM owning Shutdown token and not letting it go.\n2) Then from vCenter: Manual Shutdown of CVM -> Manually put related ESXi host in Maintainance mode -> Exit Maintainance mode -> Start CVM\n3) Go to PRIMS and upgrade continues... and so does 2048...\n \n- Koji","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/hypervisor-upgrade-esxi-using-one-click-host-maintainance-mode-issue-11093?postid=11093#post11093","creationDate":"2016-06-23T08:41:47+0000","relativeCreationDate":"5 years ago"},"numberOfViews":1039,"contentType":"discussion","publicLabel":"","category":{"url":"\/workloads-applications-6","categoryId":6,"title":"Workloads & Applications","metaRobots":"index, follow","type":0},"lastPostId":"11266"}, "isActivityPage": null, "showUnsubscribeBtn": null, "attachmentCdn": "https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/", "isGuest": true, "csrfToken": "ce66b9fce7d5414b1aa5939706c8b529e447cb36", "hideCategoryMetadata": false, "phrases": { "Forum": { "thread.unsubscribe": "Unsubscribe", "vraag": "Question", "beantwoord": "Solved" } } }">

this is a good fat box so I'm trying to convice my client chosing the coolest product and this kind of short package for little client.\n \nSo my strategy will be :\n__________\nlittle BOX :\n6\/8 nodes with 3\/4 storage pools \/ 1 vCenter & 3\/4 clusters\nmiddle BOX :\n{9\/12 nodes with 2 clusters, 1 storage pool for management \/ 1 for resources and 2\/3 containers \/ 2 vCenter (management & resources w\/ 2\/3 Vclusters} OR\n{9\/12 nodes with 3\/4 clusters, 1 storage pool each and 1 containers \/ 2 vCenter (management & resources w\/ 2\/3 clusters}\nlarge BOX :\n6+ nodes management \/ 1 cluster \/{1 SP (for RF3 +ECx support).Maybe 2 SP if NSX edge segmentation is needed}.1 vCenter 1+Vcluster.6+ nodes resources \/ 1 cluster \/ 2\/3 SP. 1vCenter 2\/3 clusters._____________\n \nw\/ your explanation (and a reserve since it will be taylored on paperboard not tested nor validated), and some pros and cons table I bet it will be fair enough for their choice to be made.\n \nsheers,","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/network-and-storage-segregation-5768?postid=5859#post5859","creationDate":"2015-11-03T15:01:44+0000","relativeCreationDate":"6 years ago"},"lastReply":{"id":5859,"author":{"id":15646,"url":"\/members\/newvirttom-15646","name":"NewVirtTom","avatar":"","userTitle":"Adventurer","rank":{"isBold":false,"isItalic":false,"isUnderline":false,"name":"Adventurer","color":"#000000"},"userLevel":0},"content":"Thanks for this Sharing \ufeff !:)\n \nI'll give you feed back on this.\n \nTo explain this choice of design, you need to understand some contraints that I have for building this blackbox :\n \nImplementation will be spread across multiple entities, including massive (1000+ VM + on demand IAAS to little (no more than 50 VMs) deployment.\nAs a matter of simplification (CAPEX volume and OPEX installation team), choice was made on only one DELL model,\nSince we need 3D support and FC child card for some entities, RC730 16G will be the only option (for nutanix).\nNutanix is balanced with VSAN on my client choice.\nmodel that will be tested : 2xE5_2680v3 CPU \/ 24 x 16 Go of RAM \/ 4 x 400Go SSD drive \/ 12x 1,2 To SAS 10k HDD \/ 2xK2 card when 3D is needed...=> this is a good fat box so I'm trying to convice my client chosing the coolest product and this kind of short package for little client.\n \nSo my strategy will be :\n__________\nlittle BOX :\n6\/8 nodes with 3\/4 storage pools \/ 1 vCenter & 3\/4 clusters\nmiddle BOX :\n{9\/12 nodes with 2 clusters, 1 storage pool for management \/ 1 for resources and 2\/3 containers \/ 2 vCenter (management & resources w\/ 2\/3 Vclusters} OR\n{9\/12 nodes with 3\/4 clusters, 1 storage pool each and 1 containers \/ 2 vCenter (management & resources w\/ 2\/3 clusters}\nlarge BOX :\n6+ nodes management \/ 1 cluster \/{1 SP (for RF3 +ECx support).Maybe 2 SP if NSX edge segmentation is needed}.1 vCenter 1+Vcluster.6+ nodes resources \/ 1 cluster \/ 2\/3 SP. 1vCenter 2\/3 clusters._____________\n \nw\/ your explanation (and a reserve since it will be taylored on paperboard not tested nor validated), and some pros and cons table I bet it will be fair enough for their choice to be made.\n \nsheers,","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/network-and-storage-segregation-5768?postid=5859#post5859","creationDate":"2015-11-03T15:01:44+0000","relativeCreationDate":"6 years ago"},"numberOfUnreadReplies":0,"numberOfReplies":5,"numberOfLikes":0,"relevantPost":{"id":5768,"author":{"id":15646,"url":"\/members\/newvirttom-15646","name":"NewVirtTom","avatar":"","userTitle":"Adventurer","rank":{"isBold":false,"isItalic":false,"isUnderline":false,"name":"Adventurer","color":"#000000"},"userLevel":0},"content":"Hi all,\n \nMy present client is making me working on a design implying to deploy a XAAS plateform with a lot of security inside (NSX is on the cook list). In our team, i was declared as the nutanix man.\n \nMy mission is to determine the best way to isolate storage from diffrent workload :\nwe'll have an integration zone, a developpement and a production zone as PAAS.\nSome node will executed heavy VDI (K2 graphic cards will achieve this),\nThen we'll have a IAAS with vcloud SP for the sandbox zone).So we can imagine some sort of multicluster with 3 cluster dedicated to 3 zones : 3D VDI zone \/ SANDBOX IAAS zone \/ and PAAS zone. It implies at least 9 nodes which is a bit too much for starting plateform.\n \nMy question is, can I make a 6 node cluster for nutanix \/ storage point, with 3 volumes pools on all 6 node ?\nand more than that what will it implies in terms of storage performance, data protection, data seggregation (security team will challenge me heavily on this part) ?\nLast but not least, can I achieve this at the container level ?\n \nbest regards,\n \nThomas CHARLES","url":"\/server-virtualization-27\/network-and-storage-segregation-5768?postid=5768#post5768","creationDate":"2015-10-27T09:32:53+0000","relativeCreationDate":"6 years ago"},"numberOfViews":1266,"contentType":"question","publicLabel":"","category":{"url":"\/workloads-applications-6","categoryId":6,"title":"Workloads & Applications","metaRobots":"index, follow","type":0},"lastPostId":"5859"}, "isActivityPage": null, "showUnsubscribeBtn": null, "attachmentCdn": "https:\/\/uploads-us-west-2.insided.com\/nutanix-us\/attachment\/", "isGuest": true, "csrfToken": "ce66b9fce7d5414b1aa5939706c8b529e447cb36", "hideCategoryMetadata": false, "phrases": { "Forum": { "thread.unsubscribe": "Unsubscribe", "vraag": "Question", "beantwoord": "Solved" } } }">