问题

单个较大的驱动器还是连接到VM的几个较小的驱动器？

  • 2019年10月9日
  • 4个答复
  • 1522次观看
w
我们正在使用AHV和Windows 2019建立新文件服务器的过程。我们当前的物理服务器具有一个较大的2TB驱动器字母，用于所有文件存储，具有3-4个各种股票。我的问题是，与AHV，2TB驱动器连接到VM上以存储文件，或者最好拥有2-3个较小的附件储存驱动器，是否有任何区别？
该主题已关闭以供评论

4个答复

理查德·波特罗
秩
UserLevel 3
徽章 +5
你好 @willw

也许一个好主意是创建多个较小的驱动器，每股一个，因为根据文件服务器I/O需求，随机写缓冲区可以饱和。

我们有一个最佳实践文档，建议您为SQL Server提供单独的驱动器，您可能可以看一下建议：https://portal.nutanix.com/#/page/solutions/details?targetId=bp-2015-microsoft-sql-server：bp-2015-microsoft-sql-server

另外，您是否考虑过使用Nutanix文件来替换Windows Server上的文件服务器？
Richardson Porto -LinkedIn：http：//linkedin.com/in/richardsonporto
@willw<\/user-mention>
\n
\nMaybe a good idea is to create multiple smaller drives, one per share, since depending of the file server I\/O demand, the random write buffer can be saturated.
\n
\nWe have a best practices document where we recommend separate drives for a SQL Server that you maybe can take a look to understand the recommendation: https:\/\/portal.nutanix.com\/#\/page\/solutions\/details?targetId=BP-2015-Microsoft-SQL-Server:BP-2015-Microsoft-SQL-Server<\/a>
\n
\nAlso, did you considered the use of Nutanix Files to replace the file server on Windows Server?","quoteUsername":"RichardsonPorto","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
w
你好 @willw

也许一个好主意是创建多个较小的驱动器，每股一个，因为根据文件服务器I/O需求，随机写缓冲区可以饱和。

我们有一个最佳实践文档，建议您为SQL Server提供单独的驱动器，您可能可以看一下建议：https://portal.nutanix.com/#/page/solutions/details?targetId=bp-2015-microsoft-sql-server：bp-2015-microsoft-sql-server
另外，您是否考虑过使用Nutanix文件来替换Windows Server上的文件服务器？


谢谢 @richardsonporto

所以是的，我已经看了几次文件。我唯一的坚持是，我只有一百个左右的人连接到我们的文件服务器。我们不是一个大环境。但是我喜欢我对文件的看法。特别是新的分析和报告。

我的问题是，满足我的需求吗？它将旋转3个VM，每个12GB RAM，并且比我现在在Windows Filesever中拥有的资源更多。我在看这个，但我只是认为这会超出我的需要

对此有任何想法吗？
Hi @willw<\/user-mention>
\n
\nMaybe a good idea is to create multiple smaller drives, one per share, since depending of the file server I\/O demand, the random write buffer can be saturated.
\n
\nWe have a best practices document where we recommend separate drives for a SQL Server that you maybe can take a look to understand the recommendation: https:\/\/portal.nutanix.com\/#\/page\/solutions\/details?targetId=BP-2015-Microsoft-SQL-Server:BP-2015-Microsoft-SQL-Server<\/a>
\nAlso, did you considered the use of Nutanix Files to replace the file server on Windows Server?<\/content-quote>
\n
\n
\nThanks @RichardsonPorto<\/user-mention>
\n
\nSo yes I have looked at files several times. My only hold up is that I only have a hundred or so people connecting to our fileserver. We are not a big environment. But I have liked what I see about files. Especially with the new analytics and reporting.
\n
\nMy question is would it be overkill for my needs? It would spin up 3 vms, 12GB RAM each, and be a lot more resources than I have now in a Windows filesever. I was looking at this but I just think it would be more than I need
\n
\nOpen to any thoughts on this?","quoteUsername":"willw","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">
s
秩
UserLevel 3
徽章 +3

@willw在说什么，并指向 @richardsonporto关于性能以及有关文件分析的发现，“冗余”是您可以依靠文件的。如果您正在为用户主文件夹使用分布式共享，并且一个FSVM下降，那么Windows File Server可能不会丢失“服务”。

另外，使用Windows文件服务器，您将需要放下服务器以进行“更新和修补”，而文件没有停机时间。

另一个功能是，当文件服务器出现问题时，群集可以生成警报，而Windows则必须检查事件查看器。

希望这些交易可以使它值得切换到文件。

@willw<\/user-mention>\u00a0 on the top of what what was said and pointed by @RichardsonPorto<\/user-mention>\u00a0\u00a0about the performance and what you found out regarding Files analytics, \u201cRedundancy\u201d is something you can count on with Files. If you are using distributed shares for user home folders and one FSVM goes down there won\u2019t be a loss of \u201cService\u201d like it could be the case for Windows file server.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Also, with Windows file server you will need to bring down the server for \u201cupdates\u00a0and patching\u201d, with Files no downtime.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Another feature is the ability of the cluster to generate alerts\u00a0 when something is wrong with File servers, with Windows you have to check the event viewer.<\/p>

Hope these are trades that could make it\u00a0worth switching to Files.<\/p>","quoteUsername":"sbarab","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

阿罗纳
秩
UserLevel 6
徽章 +5

@willw根据设置的要求和期望，您可以使用一个节点fs：

Nutanix Files 3.1引入了单个FSVM部署，该部署旨在为单位和两节点Nutanix群集。您还可以使用5.10.1或更高版本的较大群集进行单个FSVM部署。

Nutanix文件：文件服务器虚拟机

@willw<\/user-mention> Depending on the requirements and expectations of the setup you could go for a one node FS:<\/p>

Nutanix Files 3.1 introduced single FSVM deployments intended for one- and two-node Nutanix clusters. You can also have single FSVM deployments for larger clusters with 5.10.1 or later.<\/p><\/blockquote>

Nutanix Files: File Server Virtual Machine<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>","quoteUsername":"Alona","translations":{"Common":{"like":"Like","unlike":"Unlike"},"Forum":{"Quote":"Quote","Share":"Share"}}}">

条款和条件
Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.button":"Accept cookies","cookiepolicy.button.deny":"Deny all","cookiepolicy.link":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.title":"Cookie settings","cookiepolicy.modal.content":"We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.<\/a>","cookiepolicy.modal.level1":"Basic
Functional","cookiepolicy.modal.level2":"Normal
Functional + analytics","cookiepolicy.modal.level3":"Complete
Functional + analytics + social media + embedded videos"}}}">
Baidu